![]() Psycho-Werefox: It shouldn't be unreasonable to expect considering it's supposed to be one of GOG's main selling points. I'd very much love for GOG to just be a massive library of games from my childhood and adolescence and a testament to what made PC gaming so great in the 90s. I don't want to refund the game if there's a way to get it to work, the point of me paying for it is to continue to support the development and release of all these retro titles and to encourage it further. If anything, they could've paid said modders to contribute their work towards restoring the game and tweaking it to run better, they've done as much in the past. If they can't deliver on re-releasing decades old games that can run on modern systems, then what even is the point considering so many of them are practically abandonware at this point? Sure, I expect a few hiccups here and there attributed towards certain variables between each person's gaming setup, but to not take into account this business with DX wrappers or screen resolutions past a certain limit when community mods have already done so years ago seems incredibly shortsighted. It shouldn't be unreasonable to expect considering it's supposed to be one of GOG's main selling points. Tfishell: Every single GOG release has issues for a percentage of people, I don't think "run fine out of the box" 100% of the time is a reasonable expectation. I'm a bit surprised they didn't find a way to incorporate the additions Verok had for his mod, but yeah, if I absolutely have to, I'll jump on that. So has GOG actually responded to any of the issues people have been having with an official solution? As someone mentioned above, I'd rather avoid modding this game because I expect it to run fine out of the box, which some people have managed. Otherwise it just comes off as being kind of pretentiously blowing smoke up everyone's ass, honestly. ![]() It's not even a mod or anything, based on what he's said, and seems to just be a series of instructions he could easily post for everyone's benefit if it actually does work. ![]() This dude's basically been responding to every thread with "I have a solution, but I'm waiting for the okay from some other random site to be able to disclose it to the public at large". Why not just post the guide here for everyone's benefit? Thank you for saying what I held back on. Wh1tepointer: I don't get it, why do you need to wait for some third party site's approval before a guide YOU wrote becomes available? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |